Law Scenario

1 . Is bloody shame an autarkical contractor or an employee ? calculate the factors that led to your determinationInitially , bloody shame was hired to cypher on a specific project . At this stage Mary was an independent contractor . As this project was nearing completion , she was asked to carry on with a new project under a supervisory program . eyepatch doing this engage she was given access to bon ton materials and equipment and too she had to adhere to the work schedules inherent in the partnership . This changes her spatial relation to that of an employee .2 . Has the employer /employee blood changed e veryplace the course of time ? If so , howThis feature changed over a period of time , because Mary s work parceling and working conditions changed in such a sort that they were identical to what an employee ge nerally works under . As such her utilization status changed from that of an independent contractor to that of an employee . This is because from a peculiar(a) ready of work that she was initially working on , she was world utilized for different projects and she was asked to work with equipment owned by the company and also to follow the work schedules under the control of the company s supervisor3 ) Was Mary s release legal under the philosophical system of employ-at-will wherefore or why not ? If not , which of the following exceptions to manipulation-at-will pass on been break ? Whya ) check of public policy , b ) shock of implied promise of intimately trust and fair dealing and c ) Breach of implied contractMary s release was not legal under the doctrine of employment at will because this is violative of breach of implied obligation of adept faith and fair dealing .

The covenant of guileless faith and fair dealing exists in every employment relationship , it has been interpreted to imply either that employer personnel decisions be exposed to a `just cause standard or that terminations do in bad faith or motivate by malice are prohibited Mary s work was prominent and even during the period of economic crisis she did a very good job . However , after the company healed and good times for the company were ushered in , the supervisor neglected her fealty and indulged in nepotism by employing his cousin . In this charge an manginess was done to Mary and instead of being rewarded for her use and leal work , she was summarily dismissed and replaced by a person whose main qualification was that she was the supervisor s cousinMuhl , Charles J . The occupation - at - will doctrine : three major exceptions . periodical lug Review . January 2001 . Retrieved from HYPERLINK http /www .bls .gov /opub /mlr /2001 /01 /art1 broad(a) .pdf http /www .bls .gov /opub /mlr /2001 /01 /art1full .pdf on direful 12 , 2006 . PAGE 2...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper