How Much is That Kidney in the Window by Bruce Gottliebs Essay

How Much is That Kidney in the Window by Bruce Gottliebs - Essay ExampleThis paper illustrates that Gottlieb was able to provide sufficient evidence that the loss of peerless kidney does non pose as much health danger as it is being made turn up to be recipients of donated kidneys do not in truth care whether it was sold or controln as long as it extends the life of ones love one it would actually be much economical two for the government and all citizenry concerned if kidneys were sold and, the feared slippery slope disaster that some batch for see go out not happen in this case because the act of selling kidneys is neither inevitable nor unconscious. Gottlieb first points out that statistics do not support the common notion that the loss of one kidney whitethorn lead to a significantly less healthy life for the organ donor. This fact is actually back up by accounts from the website of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDKD), which m entions that people are still able to live a normal life even with one kidney as many people actually donate their kidney to friends or family members. Next, he points out that friends and family members of a person who needs a kidney transplant do not really care much about how the organ was acquired, as long as it is able to save their loved ones life. And indeed, their perspective on the issue is the most important one to be considered. Surely, family members themselves would give up their own organ for their loved one if and when needed. Unfortunately, the twisted irony of genetic lottery sometimes disqualifies a persons closest kins and thus leaves the family with a great sense of helplessness. Gottlieb then comeback to discuss the economic benefits behind the act of kidney selling (Gottlieb). At first glance, it may seem unreactive to discuss the selling of body parts as part of an economic activity but the nipping hard facts indicate that such a flow of reasoning cannot be simply ignored. Some researchers set out gone to the extent of actually quantifying the economic benefits presented by organ-selling (Kolnsberg). However, with the way things are going in the stream economic climate, people are still going to end up dead with two kidneys full if they are not able to put food on the table. Such a view is support by Malek, who points out that kidney selling is ones personal decision and so people should not be prevented from doing something that may be profitable for them, as it is their basic right to a better bureau of living (Malek). Finally, Gottlieb contradicts the unfounded fear of the slippery-slope phenomenon in the case of kidney-selling (Gottlieb). He stresses that since the act of kidney selling is not inevitable, nor is it unconscious, thither is no reason to fear that such a practice will be abused. In fact, this that strengthens the reasons behind specifically legalizing kidney-selling and banning the selling of other body organs th at are much more needed to enjoy normal living by a human person. Without such legislation, the act of kidney-selling will remain a dangerous trade and will pose greater danger in peoples lives. As one can see, Gottlieb was able to solidly structure his thoughts and ideas in supporting the home to legalize the selling of kidneys. By presenting a valid and logical flow of arguments and by stressing that the loss of one kidney does not pose as much health danger as it is being made out to be, recipients of