Narsapur vs. America :: Feminism Feminist Essays

Narsapur vs. AmericaThis Womens Studies Senior Seminar class has provided the hazard to read about many cross-cultural issues pertaining to women. In the clause, Women Workers and Capitalist Scripts Ideologies of Domination, putting surface Interests, and the Politics of Solidarity by Chandra Talpade Mohanty, issues of poor women worker in the global capitalist arena (3) are addressed. Mohanty focuses on the plight of exploited, poor Third-World women. She illuminates specific issues that carry on to the transformation of developing countries to capitalism. Mohantys article is split up into ingredients, the section that I want to focus on in order to equalize key issues amid Narsapur and America is called Housewives and Homework The Lacemakers of Narsapur. In this specific article Mohanty illuminates the effects that capitalism has on areas that are being developed, she portrays its effects on women as well as men. In Narsapur the lace making assiduity skyrocketed betwee n the years 1970 and 1978. As a egress of the increased demand, the play of making lace and the final product, which is lace, has been feminized while the trade or exporting of the lace is viewed as business, as a masculinize activity. Women working right(prenominal) the home in this culture are defined as housewives, thusly the job of being a lacemaker is defined as housework. Mohanty argues that the definition of women as housewives also suggests the heterosexualization of womens work - women are always defined in relation to men and conjugal marriage (12). As a result of the heterosexualization of womens work plus the feminization of the process and product and the virilisation of the trade men sell womens products and live on salary from womens labor (12). I think there are similarities between the hegemony in Narsapur and in the United States. Our societys practices and treatment towards womens work and the treatment of womens work in Naraspur can be compared. One comparison in the U.S. is the treatment of womens work outdoor(a) of the job force. By sheer lack of acknowledgement, womens work inner the home is overlooked and hence not considered to be work at all. Work that receives no recognition is invisible and invisibility of work carries with it no economic power. American women are still perceived as earlier being housewives first, then they are doctors or lawyers or you can englut in the blank.